Gateways to Fort Ancient
By Thos. J. Brown.
During a
recent visit to Fort Ancient, after a period of several years, I
was greatly impressed by the improvements that have taken place
there since I have been acquainted with the fort. My visits to
it were begun forty-seven years ago, and have been repeated at
short intervals until late years, then not so often. When I
first saw it, and continuing until about the time the State
acquired title to it, it was one of the most neglected and
uninviting tracts of land that ever came under my notice in
Ohio, except for its historic associations it was very
undesirable property indeed. It was, except a small tract near
the road, a tangled thicket of trees, bushes, (principally
briars), logs, weeds, etc. I believe it had more blackberry
bushes on it than any other tract of equal size in the county. I
have known people to drive 14 or 15 miles to it to gather
blackberries, and feel well repaid for their trouble. The
blackberry bushes have disappeared, with most of the undesirable
undergrowth. Logs, brush, weeds and stones are also gone or have
been applied to useful purposes. Those dreadful washes which
were working back farther and farther within the ramparts from
year to year have been arrested in their work of destruction and
in some cases at least seem to be in a measure an element of
beauty. Still the work of restoration is not completed. The few
acres to the north of the public road ought to be added to the
rest, and the road should be turned out of its present track
through the fort and be directed to another alongside the hollow
which bounds the fort along the north, until it gets beyond the
fort. The main entrances to the fort would of course remain
where they are, but they would then be private ones. The strip
referred to would add greatly to the fine appearance and
"business like" purposes of the fort. Although the ramparts
along the north side are in no place more than a few rods from
the road, they are so smothered with undergrowth and unshapely
trees that they are not in sight of the road, and are hard to
follow. If that tract were acquired by the State and put under
the care of the Ohio Archaeological and Historical Society,
along with the rest, it would soon be made very attractive.
In reading
descriptions of Fort Ancient we notice constant allusion to its
numerous "gateways," and these are generally coupled with
expression of wonder that there should be so many. Now I have
made these "gateways" my special study during my whole
acquaintance with it. I have walked the whole length of the
ramparts and counted every footstep and every gap, and carefully
noted the distance of these gaps apart, and long ago concluded
that there are but about five bona-fide gateways, the rest being
intended rather for points of defense than for places of ingress
and egress. The earthen ramparts would afford little protection
to the defenders in case an assault were made upon them. The
inside slopes are as steep as the outside and afford no suitable
standpoint, so the defenders' bodies would be protected and yet
give him opportunity to see over the rampart. If he stood upon
the top he would be even a better target for the assailants than
they would be for him. I consider it necessary to conclude that
each of these gaps was occupied with a blockhouse reaching out
beyond the wall, forming a bastion from which defenders could
enfilade the outside of the ramparts most effectually. The
distance of these gaps apart is in no case too great to serve
this purpose, and if we consider it in this way, the whole
outside of the walls could be defended with very little exposure
on the part of the defenders. There was evidently one gateway
where the public road now enters from each side, and one at the
extreme farthest end of the "old fort," one near the middle of
the north side, and one most likely on the west side opening
from the peninsula, and one nearly opposite on the east side.
The rest of these gaps were intended merely to give opportunity
for introducing blockhouses at proper distances and in proper
positions for defense, and may have been supplied with small
wickets, easily closed and easily defended. Even the
acknowledged gateways were probably built in the same general
way, but with the portal idea unmistakable and prominent.
Having
appreciated the value of Fort Ancient so long, as a memorial of
the mysterious Mound Builders, and having seen such marked
progress in the way of preserving it, it is particularly trying
and annoying to me to see such a small, and yet such an
important portion of the fort still outside the ownership and
jurisdiction of the State and Archaeological Society as the
strip north of the road. The amount probably necessary to
acquire it would be so little to the State, now out of debt,
that it looks unpardonable that it should be neglected any
longer, the public road should be turned around as intimated
before, so as to throw the works all within one enclosure.
Let us hope
that before another year has passed the few remaining acres may
be added, and all will be safe.
Online Resources
|
Ohio AHGP
Source: Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Publications, Volume XII, 1903.
|